AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 358 wordsLalit Batra, J
Present petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C is for grant of regular bail to petitioner-Pardeep in case FIR No.17 dated 18.03.2020 under Section 379-A
IPC, registered at Police Station GRP Jind, District GRP, Ambala Cantonment.
In compliance of order dated 13.10.2020, short reply dated 23.11.2020 by way of affidavit of Gurdial Singh, Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Railways, Haryana, Hisar, filed on behalf of respondent-State, is taken on record, in terms of which, as per record, besides instant case, no other case
is registered against the petitioner.
Learned counsel for petitioner INTER ALIA contends that version, as alleged in the FIR, is totally concocted one and there is no iota of truth therein.
He further submits that in the instant case FIR, petitioner was arrested on 18.03.2020. He further urges that petitioner was granted interim bail by this
Court on 13.10.2020. He further urges that petitioner is no more required by the Police for any investigation purpose. He further submits that challan
has been presented in Court but charges are yet to be framed. He further urges that since trial of the case would take sufficient time to conclude, no
useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner behind the bar.
On the other hand, learned State counsel while opposing instant petition has vehemently argued that keeping in view seriousness of offence, petitioner
does not deserve the concession of bail.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the contents of petition as well as reply furnished at the instance of respondent-
State.
At this stage, without commenting anything on the merits of the case lest it may prejudice the outcome of the trial but taking into consideration the fact
that petitioner was already granted interim bail by this Court on 13.10.2020; that challan has already been presented in Court and since consequent
trial of the case would take sufficient time to conclude, no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner behind the bar, thus, he deserves
the concession of bail.
In view of above, order dated 13.10.2020 granting interim bail to petitioner, is made absolute and petition stands allowed.
