High CourtsSingle Bench

Pardeep Kumar vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 9 June 2026 · Citation: (2026) 06 P&H CK 0576

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Moudgil, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 483 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 61(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 416, 467, 471 · Information Technology Act, 2000 — Section 66D
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous (M) No. 32869 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 478 words

Sandeep Moudgil, J

The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under section 483 of BNSS, 2023 439 of CrPC) for the grant of interim regular bail of 30 days to the petitioner in FIR No. 394 dated 28.10.2025 registered u/s 318 (4) of BNS/ 420 of IPC, 319 of BNS/ 416 of IPC & Sections 336(3) of BNS/ 468 of IPC, 338 of BNS/ 467 of IPC, 340 (2) of BNS/ 471 of IPC, 61 (2) of BNS/ 120B of IPC and section 66D of Information and Technology Act, 2000 added later on, Police Station Cyber West, Gurugram (Annexure P-1).

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the wife of the petitioner has delivered a child on 22.05.2026 and except the old aged mother, there is no other person to look after and care her. He, therefore, submits that the presence of the petitioner is essential for the medical recovery of his wife and the care of the newborn.

In compliance with the order dated 04.06.2026, status report filed by way of an affidavit of Gaurav Fogat, HPS, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Cyber, Gurugram, is taken on record.

The relevant para of the above-said affidavit would read as under:-

"That so far as the prayer for interim bail on the ground of birth of his child and taking care of mother and child is concerned, it is submitted that ASI Rakesh, P.S. Cyber West, Gurugram visited the address of the petitioner i.e. Vishwakarma Colony, Bhattu Kalan, Fatehabad. There, two neighbours of the petitioner namely Pratap S/o Ramji Lal R/o Bhattu Mandi, Fatehabad and Prithvi Raj S/o Gangajal R/o Bhattu, Fatehabad were found. Both of them got recorded their separate statements that they live in the neighbourhood of the petitioner. Pushpa W/oPardeep Kumar (present petitioner) lives alone with her child. The parental house of Pushpa is at Jhansal, Distt. Hanumangarh (Rajasthan). They further stated that 15 days ago, Pushpa gave birth to a child through operation. She is being looked after by her mother-in-law Santosh whose age is 53 years. They further stated that Pushpa and her mother-in-law are facing difficulty in care of child as well as Pushpa herself. The statements of neighbours Pratap and Prithvi Raj are attached herewith as Annexure R-2 and Annexure R-3."

Considering the fact that admittedly the petitioner's wife gave birth to a child through operation and there is no other male member to take care of her and newborn child, this Court finds that a case for grant of interim regular bail is made out.

Accordingly, the petitioner is granted interim regular bail for a period of 30 days commencing from 10.06.2026, subject to furnishing the requisite bonds to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.

The petitioner shall surrender before the concerned Jail Authorities before 5 PM on 09.07.2026.

The application in the aforesaid terms stands disposed off.