High CourtsSingle Bench

Paritosh Sharma vs UTI Infrastructure Technology And Services Limited And Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 13 December 2017 · Citation: (2017) 12 DEL CK 0342

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunil Gaur, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 11053 Of 2017, Civil Miscellaneous No. 45217 Of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 260 words

Sunil Gaur, J

1.

In this petition, quashing of Office Order No./3/2016-17; Office Order No./4/2016-17; Office Order No./6/2016-17 to /36/2016-17 of 2n2d April,

2016 and Office Order No. 67/2016-2017 of 21st July, 2016, is sought by petitioner, who is aggrieved by denial of promotion from the post of Assistant

Vice President to Deputy Vice President. The grievance of petitioner is that in spite of his seniority and performance, he has not been promoted. Vide

Communication of 13th February, 2017 (Annexure P-7 colly.) it was conveyed to petitioner that promotion in question has been already made on 22nd

April, 2016. It is the case of petitioner that thereafter, he sought information under RTI (Annexure P-8 colly.) and obtained Office Memorandum of

14th May, 2009 and respondents’ Staff Rules of 1995.

2.

Since petitioner has not made any Representation to the first respondent against denial of promotion to him, therefore, it is deemed appropriate to

dispose of this petition while permitting petitioner to make a concise Representation to first respondent within a week from today and if it is so done,

first respondent shall decide it by passing a speaking order and would also intimate petitioner about his APARs, seniority list and the criteria governing

the promotion from the post of Assistant Vice President to Deputy Vice President, within two weeks thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the

remedies as available in law, if need be.

3.

With aforesaid directions, this petition and the application are disposed of.

4.

Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for the parties.