High CourtsDivision Bench(2012) 06 SHI CK 0152

Parmanand vs State of H.P.

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 15 June 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph, C.J · Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 3823 of 2012-C

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 203 words

Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice

1.

Heard Learned Counsel on both sides. The petitioners, in all these cases, are aggrieved since they are not paid the retiral benefits. Some of the petitioners also have a case regarding payment of arrears of salary and arrears on account of revision of salary. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the Corporation is facing a financial crunch and only after disposing of some of the fixed assets, some of the liabilities have been settled. A similar issue was considered by this Court leading to the judgment dated 27th April, 2011 in CWP No. 455 of 2011 and connected matters. this Court had disposed of all those writ petitions with a direction to the Corporation to settle the liabilities within four months from the date of the judgment. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the Corporation to settle the eligible dues including dearness allowance and arrears of salary etc. to all the petitioners and similarly situated employees on the principle of seniority in terms of the retirement within a period of four months from today.

2.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.

Copy dasti.