High CourtsSingle Bench

Parminder Kumar And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 11 July 2023 · Citation: (2023) 07 P&H CK 0046

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Chitkara, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 21
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 6708 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 530 words

Anoop Chitkara, J

1.

Fearing for life and liberty at the hands of the private respondents, the petitioners, invoking the fundamental right of life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, have come up before this Court seeking protection through the State.

2.

Bar is abstaining from work today. Given the nature of the order that this Court proposes to pass, no notices are required to be issued to the respondents. However, concerned official respondent(s) are directed to comply with this order. Copy of this petition has already been supplied to them by the petitioners.

3.

If the allegations of apprehension of threat to their lives turn out to be true, it might lead to an irreversible loss. Thus, in the facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, it shall be appropriate that the concerned Superintendent of Police, SHO, or any officer to whom such powers have been delegated or have been authorized in this regard, provide appropriate protection to the petitioners for one week from today. However, if the petitioners no longer require the protection, then at their request it may be discontinued even before the expiry of one week. After that, the concerned officers shall extend the protection on day-to-day analysis of the ground realities or upon the oral or written request of the petitioners.

4.

This protection is subject to the stringent condition that from the time such protection is given, the petitioners shall not go outside the boundaries of the place of residence, except for medical necessities, to buy household necessities, and for bereavements in the families of the close relatives or close friends. However, petitioner(s) shall be at liberty to shift the residence(s) and if the new place falls with the district, then the protection shall be extended to such place. This restriction saves the petitioners from apprehended risk and ensures that the protection is not flaunted.

5.

It is clarified that there is no adjudication on merits and that this order is not a blanket bail in any FIR. It is further clarified that this order shall not come in the way if the interrogation of the petitioners is required in any cognizable case. It shall also be open for the petitioner(s) to approach this Court again in case of any fresh threat perception.

6.

This order shall eclipse after fifteen days from today.

7.

However, qua other prayers, liberty reserved to the petitioners to file a fresh representation to the concerned Superintendent of Police/Commissioner of Police, within fifteen days from today. If the petitioners file a representation within the above-mentioned time period of fifteen days, then, the same shall be decided by the concerned Superintendent of Police/Commissioner of Police, within two months.

8.

There would be no need for a certified copy of this order, and any Advocate for the Petitioners and State can download this order and other relevant particulars from the official web page of this court and attest it to be a true copy. The concerned officer can also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for immediate use.

Petition is allowed to the extent mentioned above. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed.