High CourtsSingle Bench

Parmod Kumar vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 22 May 2026 · Citation: (2026) 05 P&H CK 1074

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Vashisth, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 482 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous (M) No. 48527 Of 2026 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 346 words

Sanjay Vashisth, J

1.

The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438 Cr.P.C.), for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed hereunder:-

Name & age of petitioner

FIR No.

Date

Section(s)

Police Station

District

Parmod Kumar (44 years)

1189

25.07.2025

21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and 303(2) of BNS

H.S.En.B.

Ambala

2.

On 01.09.2025, by noticing the submissions of counsel for the petitioner, notice of motion was issued and arrest of the petitioner was stayed because petitioner in his submissions had expressed his willingness to pay the price of the minerals and applicable royalty along with fine.

3.

After calculation, the State authorities informed the petitioner to deposit an amount of Rs.4,30,000/-, but the said amount was not deposited by the petitioner. However, to enable the petitioner to comply with his own undertaking and also with an object to grant another opportunity, hearing was deferred for 22.05.2026 i.e. for today itself.

4.

Till date, the said amount as informed by the State authorities,

has not been deposited by the petitioner. Rather, he challenges the calculation of the amount saying that the same has not been properly and adequately calculated by the State authorities. In the proceedings of the present petition, wherein discretionary relief is being under consideration, based upon the principle of equity as well and also being aware of the fact that there are numerous instances increasing day by day in both the States i.e. Haryana and Punjab, where such crimes are at rise, no leniency can be applied and that too for saving the money which, in fact, belongs to the State Exchequer meant to utilize for the citizens of the States. Therefore, interim relief granted vide order dated 01.09.2025 i.e. in regard to the stay of arrest of the petitioner is withdrawn/recalled. Investigating Officer is directed to immediately proceed in the matter.

5.

Petition stands dismissed.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.