High CourtsSingle Bench

Parveen Kumar and Another vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 22 June 2011 · Citation: (2011) 06 SHI CK 0241

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajiv Sharma, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CWP (T) No. 10345 of 2008

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 108 words

Rajiv Sharma, J.—The pay of the Petitioners was enhanced vide office order dated 23.5.2003. However, the same has been withdrawn unilaterally vide order dated 14.10.2003 (Annexure A-1). The Petitioners have neither been issued any show cause notice nor they have been afforded ample opportunity of being heard before the issuance of order dated 14.10.2003, Annexure A-1. Since the salary of the Petitioners has been reduced, that too, unilaterally, they have suffered civil and evil consequences.

2.

Consequently, the petition is allowed. Annexure A-1 dated 14.10.2003 is quashed and set aside. However, liberty is reserved to the Respondents to proceed with the matter in accordance with law. No costs.