High CourtsSingle Bench

Parveen Kumar vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 19 December 2022 · Citation: (2022) 12 P&H CK 0083

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Chitkara, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 323, 506 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 482
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 6156 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 148 words

Anoop Chitkara, J

Seeking quashing of FIR No.635 dated 30.11.2018, registered under Sections 323, 506 IPC, 1860 at Police Station Dharuhera, District Rewari, the petitioner had come up before this Court by filing the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Counsel for the State submits that after filing of the present petition, charges have been framed. Once judicial order has been passed and charges have been framed, it becomes mandatory to challenge judicial order which has overwritten the police report.

Given above, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh petition challenging the framing of charges, if so desires.

It is clarified that the time for which the present petition is pending before this Court, shall not be counted for the purpose of limitation as such, limitation period will start from today i.e. 19.12.2022.

All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.