High CourtsSingle Bench(2013) 07 P&H CK 0328

Pawan Kumar vs State of Haryana and Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 25 July 2013

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajesh Bindal, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Regular First Appeal No. 4538 of 2007 (O and M)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 305 words

Rajesh Bindal, J.—This order will dispose of RFA Nos. 4538 of 2007, 4066, 5377, 5378, 6296 of 2012, 1926, 2579, 2580 and 3515 of 2013, as the same arise out of common acquisition. The landowners are in appeal before this court against the award of the learned court below seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land.

2.

Briefly, the facts are that vide notification dated 9.8.2002, issued u/s 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, ''the Act''), the State of Haryana sought to acquire land situated within the revenue estate of village Patti Kaisth Seth, Tehsil and District Kaithal, for commercial, residential and institutional Sector-21, Kaithal. Notification u/s 6 of the Act was issued on 8.8.2003. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, the Collector) assessed the market value of the acquired land @ Rs. 5,00,000/- per acre. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowners filed objections. On reference, the learned court below determined the market value of the acquired land @ Rs. 350/- per square yard. In some cases, the compensation was assessed @ Rs. 280/- per square yard. The landowners are now in appeals seeking further enhancement of compensation.

3.

Learned counsel for the parties did not dispute the fact that the issue raised in the present set of appeals is squarely covered by judgment of this court in R.F.A. No. 254 of 2008 - Parveen Kumari vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 4.4.2011, whereby this court upheld the award of the Collector and assessed the compensation @ Rs. 280/- per square yard for the acquired land. Since this court had determined the compensation @ Rs. 280/- per square yard, the claim made in the present appeals for further enhancement does not survive. As there is no merit in the appeals, the accompanying applications are also dismissed.