CourtKutchehry.com
Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Pawan Kumar Tyagi vs Vijay Kumar Dev & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 15 September 2020 · Citation: (2020) 09 CAT CK 0055

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narasimha Reddy, J · Mohd. Jamshed, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 139 Of 2020 In Original Application No. 358 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 172 words

L. Narasimha Reddy, J

1.

The applicant filed O.A. No 358/2020 in relation to medical reimbursement. The O.A. was disposed of on 06.02.2020 with a direction to the respondents to pass orders on the representation submitted by him. This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents did not comply with the order passed in O.A. No.358/2020.

2.

In the reply, the respondents stated that the order was passed on 01.05.2020, rejecting the claim of the applicant, thereby the order in the O.A. stood complied with.

3.

The only direction issued in the O.A. was that the respondents shall pass order on the representation submitted by the applicant. It appears that the applicant was not aware of the fact that an order, in fact, was passed on 01.05.2020. If he is not satisfied with the said order, he can pursue the remedy in accordance with rules.

4.

We, therefore, close the C.P., leaving it open to the applicant to pursue remedies vis-à-vis the order dated 01.05.2020, if he so intends. No costs.