High CourtsSingle Bench

Pawan Singh Bhadouriya vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 14 August 2023 · Citation: (2023) 08 MP CK 0091

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 309, 439 · Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 — Section 34(2)
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 35879 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 548 words

Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar, J

This first bail application has been filed by applicant under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of bail in connection with Crime No.319/2020 registered at Police Station Umari, District Bhind (M.P.), for an offence punishable under section 34(2) of the Excise Act. The applicant is in judicial custody since 02/08/2023.

According to the prosecution case, on secret information police squad reached on the spot and on search, country-made illicit liquor quantity 50 bulk liters was recovered from possession of other co-accused persons. Therefore, a case under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act was registered.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has falsely been implicated in the matter merely on the basis of statement of co-accused Rahul recorded under Section 27 of the Evidence Act which is not admissible in evidence against him. No recovery is made at the instance of the applicant. None of the witnesses have seen him at the place of incident. Applicant is an agriculturist by profession. Applicant is permanent resident of village Aklouni, Tehsil Gormi, District Bhind. He is sole bread earner in the family and there is no likelihood of his absconding leaving family and property. The investigation is almost complete, therefore, there is no likelihood of interference in the investigation. No further custodial interrogation is needed. Jail incarceration is causing financial hardship to the family of the applicant. The alleged offence is triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class. The trial would take time to complete. Therefore, applicant may be extended the benefit of bail.

Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

Heard learned learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

Considering the arguments advanced by both the parties and overall circumstances of the case but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court is inclined to release the applicant on bail. Thus, the application is allowed.

Accordingly, it is directed that the applicant Pawan Singh Bhadouriya shall be released on bail in connection with Crime No.319/2020 registered at Police Station Umari, District Bhind (M.P.), for an offence punishable under section 34(2) of the Excise Act, upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of the same amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, for compliance with the following conditions, :

1.

The applicant shall remain present on every date of hearing as may be directed by the concerned Court;

2.

The applicant shall not commit or get involved in any offence of similar nature;

3.

The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them/him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the investigating officer;

4.

The applicant shall not directly or indirectly attempt to temper with the evidence or allure, pressurize or threaten the witness;

5.

The applicant shall ensure due compliance of provisions of Section 309 of Cr.P.C regarding examination of witness in attendance;

This order shall be effective till the end of trial. However, in case of breach of any of the pre-condition of bail, it shall become ineffective without reference to the Court.

CC as per rules.