AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
19 paragraphs · 364 wordsHarnaresh Singh Gill, J Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing. Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for
grant of regular bail in case FIR No.97 dated 04.10.2020 registered under Sections 307, 323, 324, 341, 427, 294, 506, 148, 149 of IPC, 1860 (Sections
452/201 IPC added later on) at Police Station Mullanpur, District SAS Nagar.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has been arrayed as an accused in the present case at the behest of the
complainant party, as Netar Singh-complainant had a dispute with his brother Pal Singh regarding passage in front of his house. The matter could not
be amicably resolved and a scuffle took place between the family members. The petitioner was not named in the FIR and no specific role has been
attributed to him. The petitioner has been in custody since 28.10.2020. Co-accused Major Singh has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated
24.11.2020 passed in CRM-M-37946-2020 (Annexure P-4).
Learned State counsel assisted by learned counsel for the complainant has drawn the attention of this Court that the petitioner was armed with iron
rod and gave beatings to complainant party and recovery is yet to be effected from the petitioner but has not disputed that co-accused Major Singh
has been granted regular bail by this Court.
Copy of custody certificate by way of affidavit dated 17.12.2020 of the Deputy Superintendent, District Jail, Rupnagar, submitted by the learned State
counsel through email, is taken on record.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner was not named in the FIR and he is in custody since 28.10.2020. Moreover, co-accused Major Singh has been granted regular bail by
this Court. Trial of the case would take time to conclude. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner the bars.
In view of the above, without commenting anything on the merits, lest it should prejudice the case of either side, the petition is allowed and the
petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate
concerned.
