AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
15 paragraphs · 258 wordsAlok Kumar Verma, J
This appeal has been filed by the wife under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against an order dated 18.12.2021, passed by learned Judge,
Family Court, Haldwani, District Nainital, in Matrimonial Case No. 162 of 2021, “Amandeep Saluja Vs. Pawanjyot Kaurâ€, whereby her objection
to the certificate, filed by the Husband (Respondent herein) under Section 65 B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, has been rejected.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Sanpreet Singh Ajmani, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in the aforesaid matrimonial case filed under Section 13 of the Hindu
Marriage Act, 1955, the respondent-plaintiff has filed electronic devices/documents along with a certificate, however, the specific requirement under
Section 65 B of the Indian Evidence Act has not been fulfilled.
During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the present appeal may be disposed of with a direction to the
learned Family Court to consider and decide application to be filed by the appellant for examination of the electronic devices/documents by the
Forensic Science Laboratory. The learned counsel for the appellant further submitted that appellant will file such application within a week from
today.
The prayer made is innocuous.
Therefore, this appeal is disposed of at the admission stage with direction to the learned Judge, Family Court to decide application of the appellant
for examination of the said electronic devices/documents within four weeks from the date of filing of such application, strictly in accordance with law.
