High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 01 MAD CK 0369

P.Dharmaraj vs The Inspector of Police

Madras High Court · Decided on 2 January 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.Rajamanickam
CASE NUMBER
14608 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 178 words
1.

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondent to register a case on the basis of the complaint of the

petitioner dated 27.08.2017.

2.

Heard Mr.R.Shankar Ganesh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Anbarasan, learned Government Advocate (crl.side), who takes

notice for the respondent.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that without calling the petitioner for enquiry, the respondent has closed the complaint.

4.

The learned Government Advocate (crl.side), on the contrary, contended that inspite of several times the petitioner was informed, the petitioner

never appeared for enquiry and hence, the complaint was closed.

5.

Recording the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate (crl.side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed. It is open to the

petitioner to send one more complaint by Registered Post along with the relevant documents. If any such complaint is sent, the respondent police

should enquire the matter and after enquiry, if it is found that any cognizable offence is made out, it has to be registered and proceed in accordance

with law.