High CourtsDivision Bench

Peanu Ram vs Himachal Road Transport And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 12 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 SHI CK 0141

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J · Satyen Vaidya, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No.4483 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 206 words

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J

1.

Notice. Mr. Ajay K. Chauhan, Advocate, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2.

The parties are at ad idem that the issue in question is no longer res integra i n view of the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in

CWP No. 3050 of 2014, titled Nek Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 17.07.2014.

3.

Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of on the basis of the ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgment.

4.

Consequently, the respondents are directed to release all the pensionary and retiral benefits to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from

today and thereafter pension shall be released to him regularly on first day of each month.

5.

However, it is made clear that in case the pensionary and retiral benefits are not extended to the petitioner within the aforesaid time, then in addition

to the pensionary and retiral benefits, even the petitioner shall also be entitled to interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the due date. Pending

application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. No order as to costs.

6.

For compliance, to come up on 07.10.2021.