High CourtsSingle Bench(2013) 04 RAJ CK 0005

Pema Ram vs The State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 8 April 2013 · Citation: (2013) 2 WLN 306

HON’BLE JUDGES
Govind Mathur, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 3233 of 2013

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 106 words

Govind Mathur, J.—By this petition for writ, validity, propriety and correctness of the order dt. 12.03.2013 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Excise, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur is questioned. The order aforesaid is appeasable as per the provisions of Section 9-(1)(d) of the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 (for short, ''the Act of 1950''). I do not find any just reason to entertain this petition for writ ignoring the statutory remedy provided under the Act of 1950. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed. The petitioner shall be at liberty to avail the remedy provided under the Act of 1950 by approaching the Division Bench of the Rajasthan Tax Board.