High Courts

Pichuvaiyangar vs Seshaiyangar

Madras High Court · Decided on 14 December 1894 · Citation: (1895) 5 MLJ 39

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 94 words
1.

We are of opinion that when there has been an appeal against the decree of the District Munsif and a decree has been passed thereon, the

District Munsif has no longer any power to amend his decree.

2.

We therefore answer the question in the affirmative.

3.

This petition again came on for final hearing before Muthu-sami Aiyar and Shephard J. J. who following the ruling of the Full Bench dismissed

the petition for amendment, cancelled the amendment made with reference to it and directed the petitioner to be entitled to his costs.