High CourtsSingle Bench

Pinki vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 29 April 2026 · Citation: (2026) 04 P&H CK 1792

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajesh Bhardwaj, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 381, 406, 420 · Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 482(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous (M) No. 72488 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 154 words

Rajesh Bhardwaj, J

1.

Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.412 dated 26.10.2024, under Sections 381, 406, 420 of IPC, 1980, registered at Police Station Sector-27, District Sonipat.

2.

Vide order dated 27.03.2026, the petitioner was directed to join investigation.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in pursuance to the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation and as such her interim bail may be made absolute.

4.

Learned State counsel, on instructions, has stated that petitioner has joined the investigation and she is no more required for further investigation.

5.

Learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

6.

In view of the above, interim order dated 27.03.2026 is made absolute subject to compliance of conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. Petition stands allowed.