High CourtsSingle Bench

Pitha Ram Choudhary vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 26 February 2020 · Citation: (2020) 02 RAJ CK 0635

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 409 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2403 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 259 words

This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.70/2019, Police Station

Bidasar, District Churu for the offences under Section 409 of IPC.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the

arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the present bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Pitha Ram

Choudhary S/o Jeevanram Choudhary, in connection with F.I.R. No.70/2019, Police Station Bidasar, District Churu, the petitioner shall be released on

bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees:

Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

(I) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as

to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.