High CourtsSingle Bench

P.N. Singh vs State of Jharkhand and Another

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 1 May 2013 · Citation: (2013) 3 AJR 300

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prashant Kumar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 379, 385
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal M.P. No. 953 of 2009
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 288 words

Prashant Kumar, J.—This application has been filed for quashing of order dated 20-04-2009, in complaint case No. C/1-829/07, whereby

the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jamshedpur concluded that there is sufficient material on record to frame charge against petitioner u/s

385/379 of the Indian Penal Code and directed him to appear on 15-5-2009 for framing of charge. Sri S.K. Sahay, learned counsel for the

petitioner submits that petitioner has filed an application for discharge on 16-09-2008, but the learned court below without disposing the same had

come to the conclusion that there are sufficient materials available on record for framing of charge against petitioner under Sections 385 and 379 of

the Indian Penal Code.

2.

From perusal of record it appears that on 20-04-2009, case was fixed for hearing on the point of charge. It also appears that on that day,

counsel for the accused appeared in the court below and after hearing both parties, learned court below considered complaint petition and

statement of witnesses recorded during examination of witnesses before charge and after considering the aforesaid evidence available on record

come to the conclusion that prima facie offence under Sections 385 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code are made out against petitioner. This shows

that learned court below had applied its mind on the materials available on record. Thus, in my view, he has impliedly rejected the application filed

by petitioner for his discharge. From perusal of complaint petition and other materials available in this record, I find that conclusion arrived by the

learned court below is legally correct and there is absolutely no illegality in it. Under the said circumstance, I am not inclined to interfere with

aforesaid impugned order. Hence, this application is dismissed.