High Courts

Ponnusami Mudali vs Mandi Sundara Mudali

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 October 1903 · Citation: (1904) ILR (Mad) 255 : (1904) 14 MLJ 356

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 170 words
1.

We think that the matter is practically concluded by the dictum of the Privy Council in the recent case of Ghulam Jilani v. Muhammed Hassan

L.R. 29 IndAp 51, that an order made on an application to file an award u/s 525 of the CPC "" would seem to be a decree within the meaning of

that expression as denned in the Civil Procedure Code."" This is a considered dictum and is, we think, fully in accordance with the scheme and

policy of the Code.

2.

The decision of the Privy Council in Muhammad Nawaz Khan v. Alam Khan ILR 18 C. 414 is not at variance with the above view. We think

that the contrary view taken in Mana Vihrama v. Krishnan Nambudri ILR 3 M. 68 is erroneous.

3.

Our answer to the reference made to us is (1) that the order of the District Munsif refusing to file the award and setting it aside is a decree and

(2) that an appeal lay against that decree.