Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Pooja Kumari vs Staff Selection Commission & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 2 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 CAT CK 0008

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashish Kalia, Member (J) · Mohd. Jamshed, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 1453 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 210 words

Ashish Kalia, Member (J)

(Through Video Conferencing)

1.

The applicant has applied for the post of Constable (Executive) Female in the Delhi Police. There is a discrepancy with regard to her height. She

has also obtained a certificate from a private hospital which says that her height is 157.3 cm, whereas the requirement is 157 cm. But, during the

course of measurement, her height was measured as 156 cm.

2.

The applicant has made then and there an appeal under the provision but, till date the same is pending and she is not satisfied with the recruitment

process undertaken.

3.

As far as, we understand that in the matters of recruitment, there shall be a transparency for the citizen before the court of law. So we hereby

direct the concerned authorities to constitute a Committee qua the Commissioner of Police who may consider another Expert Body to examine her

height. If she is found suitable she may be offered appointment in accordance with law. If she is not found suitable, her case may be rejected. The

exercise in this behalf shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4.

With this observation, the OA is disposed of. No costs.