High CourtsSingle Bench

Poulose K.O vs Angamaly Municipality Angamaly Municipal Office

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 16 July 2021 · Citation: (2021) 07 KL CK 0187

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sathish Ninan, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 14164 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 105 words

Sathish Ninan, J

1.

The petitioner confines his relief for a direction for consideration of Ext.P11 objections filed by him to Ext.P10 demand notice issued by the

respondent Municipality. Ext.P10 demand notice relates to tax arrears.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Municipality.

3.

Without expressing anything on the merits, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider Ext.P11 filed in response to Ext.P10,

before initiating further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P10. Let orders be passed within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment.