High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 05 PAT CK 0056

Prabha Kumari Srivastava, D/O Late Bhagwati Prasad vs The State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 18 May 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
11633 of 2016

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 218 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and Patna

Municipal Corporation.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to

correct the designation of the respondent No 4. Let the same be done

during course of the day.

3.

The present writ application has been filed by the

petitioner against the mutation order passed in favour of respondent

No 8.

4.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the

petitioner submitted that he has already filed a representation before

the respondent no. 4 through registered post, on 06.05.2016, which is

still pending. He prayed that the Court may direct the same to be

disposed off.

5.

Learned counsel for the Patna Municipal Corporation

agreed for a direction to the respondent no. 4 for disposal of the

representation.

6.

In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition stands

disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation

before the respondent no. 4, with regard to the grievance raised in the

present writ application. If such a representation is filed within two

weeks from today along with a copy of this order, the respondent no.

4 shall consider the same, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all

the parties, and pass orders, in accordance with law, within three

months from the date of filing such representation.