AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
11 paragraphs · 287 wordsAlok Kumar Verma, J
Proposed Criminal Revision has been filed against the judgment dated 03.06.2022, passed by learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Kashipur, District Udham Singh in Criminal Appeal No. 39 of 2022, by which, the Appeal, filed against the judgment dated 22.12.2021, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Complaint Case No. 1644 of 2019, by which, the revisionist-accused was convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of three months along with a fine of Rs. 4,60,000/- under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, has been dismissed.
Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the revisionist, Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned Brief Holder for the State and Mr. Pranav Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.2-complainant.
Admit.
Heard on Bail Application (IA No. 4 of 2023).
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate, submits that the revisionist was on bail during the trial and the appeal, and, the conditions of bail were neither violated nor misused by him.
Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the revisionist and respondent no.2 and in the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that the revisionist deserves bail at this stage.
The Bail Application (IA No.04 of 2023) is allowed.
Let the revisionist – Prabhat Gautam be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.
At the request of both the parties, present Revision is referred to the National Lok Adalat, scheduled to be held on 07.10.2023.
Revisionist and respondent no. 2 are directed to present in-person before the National Lok Adalat.
