High CourtsSingle Bench

Prabhudatta Bhol @ Sipu vs State Of Odisha

Orissa High Court · Decided on 28 July 2023 · Citation: (2023) 07 OHC CK 0242

HON’BLE JUDGES
G. Satapathy, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 363, 376(2)(n) · Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 6(1)Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(2)(v)(va)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 2873 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 520 words

G. Satapathy, J

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

This is a bail application U/S.439 of Cr.P.C. by the Petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Banarpal P.S. Case No. 57 of 2023 corresponding to Special POCSO Case No. 14 of 2023 pending in the Court of learned Court of the Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Court under POCSO Act, Angul for commission of offences punishable Under Sections 363/376(2)(n) of IPC read with Section-6(1) of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(v)(va) of SC & ST (POA) Act, on the allegation of kidnapping the victim and committing rape and aggravated penetrative sexual assault upon her by taking advantage of her caste“SC”.

3.

Heard Mr.S.K. Rout, learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as Mr. S.R Roul, learned ASC in the matter of the present bail application and perused the record. None appears for the Informant despite having reported to DLSA, Angul to appear with his own counsel.

4.

After having considered the rival submissions made and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of accusations raised against the Petitioner and keeping in view the manner and circumstance of implication of the Petitioner and regard being had to the pre trial detention of the Petitioner since 16.02.2023 with submission of charge-sheet and there being no criminal antecedent reported against the Petitioner and lastly, on going through the statement of the victim, this Court admits the Petitioner to bail.

5.

Hence, the bail application of the Petitioner stands allowed and the Petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following conditions:-

(i) the Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail,

(ii) the Petitioner shall attend the trial Court on each date of posting without fail unless his attendance is dispensed with,

(iii) the Petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial Court without prior permission till disposal of the case,

(iv) the Petitioner shall report attendance before the jurisdiction Police Station once in a fortnight preferably on Sunday in between 10 A.M. to 12 Noon for six (06) months from the actual date of his release from the custody

The I.I.C. of Jurisdictional Police Station shall not detain the Petitioner unnecessarily after recording his attendance beyond the time as stipulated.

It is clarified that the Court in seisin of the case will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner without further reference to this Court, if any of the above conditions are violated or a case for cancellation of bail is otherwise made out. In the wake of aforesaid, the subsequent involvement of the Petitioner in future for grave and serious offences on prima facie accusations may be treated as a ground for cancellation of bail in this case.

6.

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

7.

Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules.

………………………..