AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
19 paragraphs · 332 wordsTarun Shridhar, Member A
We have joined this Division Bench online through video conferencing.
Shri I.M. Kushwaha, holding brief of Shri A.B. Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Amit Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the
respondents are present.
Heard learned Counsel for the respondents and perused the record available with us in pdf
Instant contempt petition has been filed alleging non-compliance of the direction passed by this Tribunal on 07.12.2018. While disposing off the said
OA, this Tribunal had given following direction : -
“19. In view of the aforesaid discussion, the OA is allowed and the order dated 20.5.2015 and order dated 30.11.2016 of DRM, Northern Railway,
Moradabad are set aside. The DRM, Northern Railway, Moradabad is directed to consider the case of the applicant for compassionate appointment
on its own merit and in accordance with existing rules and regulations without adverting to Railway Board Circular No. E(NG)II91/RC-1/36 dated
2.1.1992 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months from today and thereafter to communicate such decision to the
applicant. No order as to costs.â€
The compliance affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the respondents has been placed before us today, which categorically states that the order
dated 07.12.2018 has been complied with by way of considering the claim of the applicant. In compliance affidavit is, a letter addressed to the
applicant by the Divisional Personnel Officer, Northern Railway, Moradabad in which the applicant has been invited to appear for selection test in the
office of the Divisional Railway Manager, Northern Railway, Moradabad alongwith necessary documents in support of his eligibility.
We are satisfied that the order passed by this Tribunal in the aforesaid OA has been complied with and this contempt petition should not proceed
any further. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings are liable to be closed and, accordingly closed. The notice is discharged.
Hon’ble Ms. Pratima K. Gupta, Member (Judicial) has consented to this order during virtual hearing.
