High CourtsSingle Bench

Pradeep Kumar Das vs Vs State Of Odisha

Orissa High Court · Decided on 2 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 OHC CK 0010

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. K. Sahoo, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 406, 420 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Anticipatory Bail Application No.6493 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 349 words

S. K. Sahoo, J

1.

This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

3.

This is an application under section 438 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Bamapada Industrial Area

P.S.Case No.60 of 2021 corresponding to C.T. Case No. 343 of 2021 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Balasore for alleged commission of

offences under sections 420, 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4.

Perused the F.I.R. annexed to the anticipatory bail application.

5.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the offences are triable by Magistrate and the main allegation is

against the son of the petitioner, the nature of accusation, the nature of punishment prescribed for the offences and on hearing the learned counsel for

the State, I am inclined to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail and accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitioner in

connection with the aforesaid case, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties each

for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with further conditions that he shall make himself available for interrogation by the I.O.

as and when required and he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the

case so as to dissuade him from disclosing any facts to the Courts or to the investigating Officer. Violation of any of the conditions shall entail

cancellation of bail.

6.

The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

7.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order

available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide

Court’s Notice No. 4587 dated 25th March 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April 2021.

 ………………………..