High CourtsSingle Bench

PRADIP KUMAR MAITY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 28 March 2018 · Citation: (2018) 03 CAL CK 0057

HON’BLE JUDGES
SHIVAKANT PRASAD, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 147, 307, 323, 354, 379, 448
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CRR 1520 of 2017, CRAN 695 of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 223 words

The petitioner Pradip Kumar Maiti in person is present who moves this CRAN application 695 of 2018 whereby he has prayed for extension of interim

order dated May 8, 2017 passed in this case whereby further proceedings in Sessions Trial Case No. 7(3)17 corresponding to sessions Case No.

27(1)17 arising out of Chandipur Police Case No. 172 of 2016 dated May 30, 2016 under Sections 147/448/323/354/307/379 of Indian Penal Code

pending in the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge, 1st Track Court, 2nd Court, Tamluk, District-Purba Medinipur was stayed for a period of

three weeks after ensuing summer vacation or until further orders, whichever is earlier. This order was further extended for a period of ten weeks

from the date or until further orders, whichever is earlier, vide order dated December 11, 2017 passed in CRAN No. 5108 of 2017.

Let the interim order be extended for another period of six weeks and the matter be listed under the heading “Contested Application†after five

weeks from the date hereof.

Liberty is given for extension or vacation and/or for modification of the order upon notice to the other side.

With the above direction CRAN 695 of 2018 stands disposed of.

Certified website copy of the order, if applied for, be urgently made available to the parties, subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.