High CourtsDivision Bench

Prafulla Dehury vs State Of Orissa

Orissa High Court · Decided on 21 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 OHC CK 0066

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. K. Mishra, J · Savitri Ratho, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 385, 386, 386(b)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 206 Of 2000
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 504 words

Â

 1. This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing mode.

 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

2. The appellant, in this case, was granted furlough leave. It is further apparent from the record that he misused the liberty granted to him as he

absconded. He did not surrender to jail custody after expiry of the furlough leave. The question, therefore, arises at present is that whether the appeal

should continue or the appeal should be dismissed. We have taken into consideration the argument advanced by the learned counsel. He relies upon

the three-Judges Bench judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Bani Singh and Others v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1996 SC 2439, wherein

the Apex Court held that the law clearly expects the Appellate Court to dispose of the appeal on merits, not merely by perusing the reasoning of the

trial Court in the judgment, but by cross-checking the reasoning with the evidence on record with a view to satisfying itself that the reasoning and

findings recorded by the trial Court are consistent with the material on record. The law, therefore, does not envisage the dismissal of the appeal for

default or non-prosecution, and only contemplates disposal on merits after perusal of the record. The Hon’ble Supreme Court further held that the

law does not enjoin that the Court shall adjourn the case.

Section 385 of the Code makes it clear that if the Appellate court does not dismiss the appeal summarily, it must call for the record from the lower

Court. Section 386 of the Code further mandates that after the record is received, after hearing the appellant or his pleader, if he appears and the

Public Prosecutor, if he appears, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal or dispose of the appeal as provided under Section 386(b) of the Code.

Thus, the plain language of Sections 385 and 386 of the Code does not contemplate disposal of the appeal for non-prosecution simplicitor. Thus, it is

clear from the above provisions that the law envisages the disposal of the appeal only on merits after perusal and scrutiny of the records.

Moreover, in a similar situation one of us (S.K. Mishra,J) has already taken a view in an earlier case that a criminal appeal cannot be dismissed for

default. Even, if the appellant is absconding, the appeal has to be heard on merit and disposed of on merit.

Accordingly, the question is answered. The paper books are ready. The matter be listed before the assigned Bench at the earliest for final hearing.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize the soft copy / downloaded copy of this

order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copies, subject to attestation by concerned Advocate along

with seal, in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25.03.2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798 dated 15.04.2021.

……..…………..