High CourtsDivision Bench

Pramod Kumar Meena vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 23 November 2020 · Citation: (2020) 11 RAJ CK 0072

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sabina, J · Chandra Kumar Songara, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 226
CASE NUMBER
Habeas Corpus Petition No. 213 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 127 words

Petitioner has filed the Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Detenue has been produced in the Court today and she has stated that she is a major and is aged about 22 years. She has further stated that she had

performed marriage with the petitioner (who is present-in-person in the court) of her own free will and wants to live with the petitioner. She has stated

that she wants to accompany the petitioner.

Keeping in view the submissions made by the detenue, she is permitted to accompany the petitioner as admittedly she is a major.

Petition stands disposed of accordingly. A copy of the order be supplied to the learned State counsel under the signatures of the Court Master for

necessary compliance.