High CourtsSingle Bench

Pramod Singh Adhikari vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 18 June 2018 · Citation: (2018) 06 UK CK 0039

HON’BLE JUDGES
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Section 7/13(1)(d), 13(2) · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 309
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 610 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 193 words

SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J. (ORAL)

1.

The applicant is in jail having been implicated in Case Crime No.09 of 2017, which has been registered under Sections 7/13(1) (d) read with Section

13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 by the Vigilance Sector, District-Dehradun.

2.

The applicant is a public servant, who was caught red handed in a trap set up by the Vigilance Department. Applicant was caught while taking the

bribe of Rs.12,000/- (Rupees Twelve Thousand Only). The trap was set up by the Vigilance Department on a complaint moved by the complainant

Mr. Amit Sharma.

3.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail

application is rejected. However, the trial court is hereby directed to expedite the trial as expeditiously as possible in letter and spirit of Section 309

CrPC without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties.

4.

It is made clear that any observation made by this Court is only for the purpose of deciding the present bail application. It shall not be taken into

consideration at all in any other proceedings.