High CourtsSingle Bench

Prashant Dubey vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 27 April 2018 · Citation: (2018) 04 CHH CK 0343

HON’BLE JUDGES
SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 420, 467, 468, 471 · Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438
RESULT
Disposed of
CASE NUMBER
M.Cr.C.(A) No. 199 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 501 words
1.

Apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.12/2018, registered at Police Station â€" Dipka, District â€" Korba (CG), for the offence

punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the IPC, the applicant has filed this application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail.

2.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the applicant issued copy of 22 points form in favour of Suraaj Singh mentioning false entry who sold the

land in dispute in favour of Mahender Singh and thereby committed the aforesaid offence.

3.

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that Suraaj Singh sold the land to Dahraj Singh on 23-04-2007 but that could not be

entered into the original land record particularly in Khasra, and therefore, the applicant who was posted as Patwari since 30-01-2009 at Patwari Halka

No.21, issued 22 point in favour of Suraaj Singh. On 26-08-2009, Suraaj Singh resold the land to Mahender Singh. The applicant issued 22 points form

on the basis of land record available and entries made in the said land record, therefore, the applicant has not committed any offence and he has been

falsely implicated in crime in question, therefore, he may be granted anticipatory bail.

4.

On the other hand, learned State counsel while opposing the bail application would submit that the Panchayat has resolved the issue on 22-08-2007

and entry was made in the Namantaran Panji, therefore, the applicant could not be issued 22 points in favour of Suraaj Singh..

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

6.

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, further taking into consideration the nature and gravity of offence, documents

filed by the applicant in which land of Dahraj Singh is not entered in the Khasra for the year 2008-09, this Court is inclined to extend the benefit of

anticipatory bail in favour of the applicant.

7.

Accordingly, this application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant in connection with the aforesaid offence, he shall

be released on bail by the officer arresting him on his executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the

satisfaction of the concerned Investigating/ Arresting Officer. The applicant shall also abide by the following conditions:-

(i) that he shall make himself available for interrogation before the concerned Arresting/Investigating Officer as and when required;

(ii) that he shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to the person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade

him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that he shall not act, in any manner, which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial; and

(iv) that he shall also appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial.