High CourtsDivision Bench(2020) 02 DEL CK 0651

Prateek Sharma And Anr vs Union Of India And Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 4 February 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dhirubhai Naranbhai Patel, CJ · C. Hari Shankar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 9974 Of 2019

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 424 words

D.N. Patel, CJ

1.

When the matter is called out nobody appears for the petitioner.

2.

This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers:

"1. To pass an order/direction to the Respondents to take immediate steps for the maintenance and upkeep of the existing footpaths.

2.

To pass an order/direction to the Respondents to take immediate steps for construction of assistive/tactile pathways on the existing footpaths.

3.

To pass an order/direction to the Respondents to take immediate steps for the construction of new footpaths with assistive/tactile pathways.

4.

To pass an order/direction to the Respondents to take immediate actions to remove and free the footpaths of all encroachments and blockades.

5.

Issue a writ/order/direction in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other writ/order/direction in the similar nature to the Respondents to take immediate steps for the maintenance and upkeep of the existing footpaths.

6.

Issue a writ/order/direction in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other writ/order/direction in the similar nature to the Respondents to take immediate steps for construction of assistive/tactile pathways on the existing footpaths

7.

Issue a writ/order/direction in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other writ/order/direction in the similar nature to the Respondents to take immediate steps for the construction of new footpaths with assistive/tactile pathways.

8.

Issue a writ/order/direction in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other writ/order/direction in the similar nature to the Respondents to take immediate actions to remove and free the footpaths of all encroachments and blockades.

9.

To pass any other order in the interest of justice."

2.

Having heard the counsel for the respondents and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the petitioners are in search of an order or direction to the respondents to maintain and upkeep the footpaths in the National Capital Territory of Delhi; construct assistive/tactile pathways on the existing footpaths; construct new footpaths with assistive/tactile pathways; and remove the encroachments/blockades from the footpaths.

3.

Taking note of the above facts, we expect from the respondents that they shall maintain/upkeep the footpaths properly and clear the encroachments/blockades on it, if any as respondents are otherwise duty bound to maintain footpaths and to keep them free from all encroachments.

4.

We also direct the respondents that whenever any new footpaths are to be constructed, the same shall be constructed with assistive/tactile pathways after considering the availability of funds and priority of work already pending with them.

5.

With these observations, this writ petition stands disposed of.