High CourtsDivision Bench

Pratik Raj vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 21 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 PAT CK 0075

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Karol, CJ · S. Kumar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10648 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

33 paragraphs · 506 words

Heard the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):-

(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding and directing the respondent authorities particularly respondent

Circle Officer to conclude the proceeding of land Encroachment Case No. 01/2014-15 which has been initiated against respondent 2nd set who have

encroached Aam Rasta appertaining to Khata No. 172, Khesra No. 1695, area 9 decimal which is in the nature of Gairmazarua Malik and as per

Khatiyan Gairmazarua Aam situated in Village-Arap, P.S.- Bikra, District-Patna.

(ii) Further for direction to the respondent 1st set to take coercive action against respondent 2nd set for removal of alleged encroachment which has

been made/encroached by respondent 2nd set appertaining to Khata no. 172, Khesra no. 1695, area 9 decimal which is in the nature of Gairmazarua

Malik.

(iii) Further for issuance of any other writ/writs, direction/directions, order/orders for which petitioner shall be found entitle under the facts and

circumstances of the case.â€​

After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that petitioner shall be content if a direction is

issued to the authority concerned to consider and decide the representation which the petitioner shall be filing within a period of four weeks from today

for redressal of the grievance(s).

Learned counsel for the respondents states that if such a representation is filed by the petitioner, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose it

of expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of its filing along with a copy of this order.

Statement accepted and taken on record.

As such, petition stands disposed of in the following terms:-

(a) Petitioner shall approach the authority concerned within a period of four weeks from today by filing a representation for redressal of the

grievance(s);

(b) The authority concerned shall consider and dispose it of expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order preferably within a period of three months

from the date of its filing along with a copy of this order;

(c) Needless to add, while considering such representation, principles of natural justice shall be followed and due opportunity of hearing afforded to the

parties;

(d) Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law;

(e) We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the

same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch;

(f) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach the Court, if the need so rises subsequently on the same and subsequent cause of action;

(g) We have not expressed any opinion on merits. All issues are left open;

(h) The proceedings, during the time of current Pandemic- Covid-19 shall be conducted through digital mode, unless the parties otherwise mutually

agree to meet in person i.e. physical mode;

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands disposed of.