High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 02 OHC CK 0129

Pravakar Das & Anr vs Mahendra Das & Ors

Orissa High Court · Decided on 15 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Biswanath Rath, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CMP NO.600 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 234 words

Biswanath Rath, J

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Parties.

2.

This Petition involves a challenge to the order passed by the Civil Judge (Jr.Divn.), Basudevpur in C.S. No.19/2013 allowing the Petition under

Order 1 Rule 10 of C.P.C.

3.

Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the Parties and entering into the disclosures through Annexure-4, this Court finds, there is at

least prima facie bringing out of a claim in favour of the third party-Intervener. For the opinion of this Court, unless such party is added and a complete

adjudication is there involving such party, there may not be effective decree going to be passed. Further in the addition of third party to the continuing

proceeding, for the opinion of this Court, addition of such party will also otherwise avoid multiplicity of litigations and/or approach to the very same

forum at the subsequent stages. In the circumstance this Court finds, there is no illegality to allow such party to be added and there is attending of an

effective adjudication. It is at this stage, taking into consideration the observations of the trial court in allowing the Petition under Order 1 Rule 10 of

C.P.C., this Court finds, the observations are purpose of consideration of the Petition under Order 1 Rule 10 of C.P.C. and have nothing to do in the

trial of the suit.

3.

The CMP thus stands disposed of.

...........................................