AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
26 paragraphs · 506 wordsHeard the parties.
Petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):-
“That this writ petition is being filed on behalf of the petitioner in nature of writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions upon the respondents to
release the seized Tata 207DIRX Pick Up vehicle bearing Registration No. BR02Q1825, Chassis No. MAT478012B9H26348, Engine No.
497SP38HYY643425, which is seized in connection with Excise Case No. 343/2018, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.
It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that he is the owner of the seized vehicle which was stolen by unknown thieves on 20.07.2018 for which he has
lodged FIR giving rise to Khiri More P.S Case No. 68 of 2018 for the offence punishable under Section 379 of IPC, and same was being used by the
miscreants for transportation of illicit liquor and 2000 litres of Country Made Liquor was recovered by the police from said stolen vehicle and the
culprits were arrested with vehicle which was seized by the police.
Petitioner claims to be owner of the seized vehicle and same was stolen on 20.07.2018 for which he had earlier instituted a case as such, petitioner
cannot be held to be responsible for transportation of illicit liquor, however, since the vehicle was used for transportation of illicit liquor same is liable
for confiscation and confiscation proceeding has been initiated by the District Collector, Gaya, in which petitioner appeared and filed his show cause
for dropping the confiscation proceeding and also release of his seized vehicle but no order was passed.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, the District Magistrate/Confiscating officer, Gaya is directed to provisionally release the vehicle of
petitioner after due identification of ownership of the vehicle which was stolen and subsequently recovered and seized by the police in excise case on
production of ownership and registration papers with respect to vehicle in question in his name with two sureties (one local) to the extent of the value
of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document.
The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also furnish the following affidavits/undertakings:
(i) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation
proceeding and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.
(ii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authorityas and when required.
(iii)Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama would be prepared wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the
petitioner and same shall be kept on record so that in future if so required, it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an
undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama. The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties
and the undertakings as stated above, which would however be subject to finalization of the confiscation proceeding.
With said observations and direction, this writ petition is disposed of.
