High CourtsDivision Bench

Pravin Kumar vs State Of Bihar Through And Ors

Patna High Court · Decided on 11 July 2019 · Citation: (2019) 07 PAT CK 0202

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jyoti Saran, J · Partha Sarthy, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bihar Prohibition And Excise Act, 2016 — Section 30(a)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8853 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 408 words

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner prays for provisional release of the Mahindra Scorpio Jeep bearing registration No. BR31P6166, Engine No. MWD4B17682, Chassis

No. MA1TA2MWND2B24910, which has been seized in connection with Thakraha P.S. Case No. 20 of 2019 for the offences punishable under

section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that confiscation proceeding is yet to be initiated and the vehicle is lying under the open sky in the

police station. The seizure list supports the seizure of the vehicle and 360 ml. of IMFL.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the nature of seizure made as well as the fact that the confiscation proceeding is yet to

be initiated, we direct that the vehicle in question be released provisionally in favour of the petitioner on production of ownership and registration with

respect to vehicle in question in his name before the designated court below with two sureties to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in

the insurance document. The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also furnish the following affidavits/ undertakings:

(i) That the vehicle in question has never been involved in any offence of similar nature in past and shall not indulge in similar offence in future.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation

proceeding and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.

(iii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and when required.

(iv) Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama would be prepared by the designated court below wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be

taken and will be certified by the petitioner and the same shall be kept on record so that in future if so required, it may be used as a secondary

evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama in course of trial.

The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings as stated above, which would

however be subject to initiation and finalization of the confiscation proceeding, if any.

With the observations above, this writ petition is allowed.