AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 408 wordsHeard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
The petitioner prays for provisional release of the Mahindra Scorpio Jeep bearing registration No. BR31P6166, Engine No. MWD4B17682, Chassis
No. MA1TA2MWND2B24910, which has been seized in connection with Thakraha P.S. Case No. 20 of 2019 for the offences punishable under
section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that confiscation proceeding is yet to be initiated and the vehicle is lying under the open sky in the
police station. The seizure list supports the seizure of the vehicle and 360 ml. of IMFL.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the nature of seizure made as well as the fact that the confiscation proceeding is yet to
be initiated, we direct that the vehicle in question be released provisionally in favour of the petitioner on production of ownership and registration with
respect to vehicle in question in his name before the designated court below with two sureties to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in
the insurance document. The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also furnish the following affidavits/ undertakings:
(i) That the vehicle in question has never been involved in any offence of similar nature in past and shall not indulge in similar offence in future.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation
proceeding and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.
(iii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and when required.
(iv) Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama would be prepared by the designated court below wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be
taken and will be certified by the petitioner and the same shall be kept on record so that in future if so required, it may be used as a secondary
evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama in course of trial.
The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings as stated above, which would
however be subject to initiation and finalization of the confiscation proceeding, if any.
With the observations above, this writ petition is allowed.
