High CourtsSingle Bench

Preetam Gurung vs Lokesh Agarwal And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 10 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0141

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 39 Rule 3
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1558 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 215 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

This is plaintiff’s petition against the order dated 02.08.2021 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun in Original Suit No. 325

of 2021. By the said order, learned trial Court has issued notices on petitioner’s temporary injunction application fixing 21.08.2021, therefore,

petitioner has approached this Court contending that, having regard to the facts of the case, learned trial Court ought to have granted ex-parte

temporary injunction order in favour of the petitioner.

2.

This Court does find any substance in the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner. Order 39 Rule 3 C.P.C. provides that grant of ex-parte

temporary injunction is an exception and issuance of notice is a Rule before granting any ex-parte temporary injunction.

3.

However, having regard to the facts & circumstances of the case and also in view of undertaking given by learned counsel for the petitioner on

behalf of his client that defendants shall be personally served within one week from today, learned trial Court is requested to consider petitioner’s

temporary injunction application and decide the same on the next date fixed i.e. on 21.08.2021 or any other day within three weeks thereafter.

4.

The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

5.

Let a certified copy of this order be issued within 24 hours.