Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Preeti vs Naresh Kumar & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 17 August 2022 · Citation: (2022) 08 CAT CK 0018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ranjit Vasantrao More, J · Anand Mathur, Member (A)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 266 Of 2022 In Original Application No. 841 Of 2022

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 178 words

Ranjit Vasantrao More, J

1.

None appeared for the petitioner. However, Mr. Amit Yadav, learned counsel for the alleged contemnors/respondents is present.

2.

The present Contempt Petition is filed alleging non compliance of the order dated 01.04.2022 passed by Division Bench of this Tribunal in OA No. 841/2022. By the said order, the respondents were directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 06.10.2021 by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order.

3.

Mr. Amit Yadav, learned counsel for the alleged contemnor/respondents places on record an order dated 24.06.2022 passed by the Dy. Secretary, Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB). A perusal of the said order reveals that the petitioner’s representation dated 06.10.2021 was disposed of by passing a speaking order.

4.

Thus, the order dated 01.04.2022 passed by the Division Bench of this Tribunal in OA No. 841/2022 has been complied with. Therefore, the Contempt Petition does not survive. It is accordingly dismissed.