High CourtsSingle Bench

Preeti vs State Of U.P.

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 11 July 2025 · Citation: (2025) 07 AHC CK 0786

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashutosh Srivastava, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 483 · Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 61(2), 103(1)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 23905 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 420 words

Ashutosh Srivastava,J.

Heard Sri Amit Kumar, Advocate, holding brief of Ms. Swati Agrawal Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Yagyavalk Pandey, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record.

This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Preeti, seeking enlargement on bail in Session Trial No. 1420 of 2025 arising out of Case Crime No. 534 of 2024, under Sections 103(1), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Dhampur, District Bijnor.

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent. She has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 20.11.2024. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that similarly circumstanced co-accused Sanjay has already been enlarged on bail by co-ordinate Bench of the co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 14.05.2025 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 11517 of 2025, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity for the reasons given in bail application of co- accused. The applicant has no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of her fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for.

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but submits that similarly circumstanced aforesaid co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court.

Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

Let the accused-applicant, Preeti, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on her executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:

1.

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.

2.

The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.

3.

The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial.

4.

The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless her personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned.

In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel her bail.