High CourtsSingle Bench

Preeto Bai (Smt.) vs Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 15 January 2007 · Citation: (2007) 1 WLN 180

HON’BLE JUDGES
Asok Parihar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 140
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 78 of 2007
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 204 words

Ashok Parihar, J.—In a case of death the petitioner was allowed Rs. 50,000/- as an interim compensation u/s 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Deeg vide order dt. 12.09.2006. Out of Rs. 50,000/- only Rs. 10,000/- was released to the petitioner. Remaining Rs. 40,000/have been ordered to be kept in fixed deposit for six years. The interim compensation u/s 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act is paid to the claimants only to meet out the immediate hardship caused due to accident. In case of death, it will not be proper and justified for the Tribunal to keep the major amount of interim compensation in fixed deposit. It is only at the final stage, the appropriate amount can be kept in fixed deposit considering the facts of each case.

2.

Having considered entire facts and circumstances, since the claim has to be decided by the Tribunal finally taking evidence of both the parties, considering the hardship caused to the petitioner due to death of her husband, the Tribunal is directed to release the remaining amount of Rs. 40,000/- kept in fixed deposit also to the petitioner immediately.

3.

With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly.