AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 372 wordsAjay Mohan Goel, J
By way of this petition, the petitioner alleges willful disobedience of order dated 30.05.2018, passed by the erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh
Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 3064 of 2018, titled as Prem Chand Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, which stood disposed of by the
learned Tribunal in the following terms:
“4. The applicant claims the benefit of judgment passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh in CWP No. 7583/2010, Paras Ram
Vs. State of H.P. and another, decided on 30.08.2011, Annexure AÂ 5. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that factual aspects are to be
verified and if the applicant is found similarly situate, benefit of the judgment referred to above, shall be extended to him.
In view of the above, the present original application is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to extend the benefit of
the judgment referred to above, to the applicant herein, in he is similarly situate, within three months from today. The applicant shall produce certified
copy of this order as well as copy of the judgment referred to above before the respondents/competent authority within a week.â€
Learned Additional Advocate General submits that in case the Court so pleases, the directions passed by learned Tribunal shall positively be
complied with by the competent authority within such time, as may be granted by this Court.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the petitioner in the interregnum has also superannuated without getting the
benefit of regularization.
Be that as it may, on the request of learned Additional Advocate General, these contempt proceedings are ordered to be dropped with the direction
that competent authority shall positively pass orders strictly in terms of the direction which stood passed by the learned Tribunal in OA No. 3064 of
2018 (supra) on or before 15th September, 2020. This Court expects the competent authority to pass a speaking and reasoned order taking into
consideration the factual matrix of the case involved visÂaÂvis the judgment of this Court in CWP No. 7583 of 2020, titled as Paras Ram Vs. State of
H.P. and another.
Petition stands disposed of in above terms. Notice stands discharged.
