High CourtsDivision Bench

Premlal Yadav vs State of C.G.

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 12 January 2006 · Citation: (2006) 1 CGLJ 450

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunil Kumar Sinha, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 439 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 363, 366, 376 · Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(2)
CASE NUMBER
M.Cr.C. No. 3202 of 2005
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 319 words

Sunil Kumar Sinha, J.—Heard.

This is an application filed u/s 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant, who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 127/2005, registered at Police Station-Gariyaband, District - Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable u/s 363, 366, 376 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The case of the prosecution is that on 19-11-2004, the applicant took the prosecutrix with him from her village to Gariyaband, from Gariyaband to Raipur, they travelled in a bus and from Raipur to Delhi, they travelled by train. The prosecutrix and the applicant returned back to the village on 31-10-2005. Though the report of absconsion was lodged by the mother on 20-11-2004, but the applicant was arrested on 4-11-2005. The prosecution has seized the school certificate of the prosecutrix, in which, her date of birth is shown as 28-2-1988. According to which, she would be aged about 16 years and 19 months on the date of incident.

Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that looking to the age and conduct of the prosecutrix, no offence u/s 376 of the IPC would be made out in this case. He prays for releasing the applicant on bail.

On the other hand learned Counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, particularly considering the age and conduct of the prosecutrix, I am of the opinion that present is a fit case in which the applicant should be enlarged on bail. His application is allowed.

Let the application be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the said Court on each date of hearing till the disposal of the trial.