High CourtsSingle Bench

Premlata Tiwari vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 8 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 RAJ CK 0276

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satish Kumar Sharma, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6452 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 292 words
1.

This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for direction to the respondent to investigate the matter in fair and impartial manner of FIR

No. 1034/2019 registered at Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur West, Jaipur for the offence under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 453, 471 & 120B IPC.

2.

Heard learned counsel for both the sides and perused the material made available on record.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR was registered on 20.10.2019 but no effective investigation is being conducted under the

influence of accused persons. This is a serious case of cheating based on documentary evidence.

Therefore, the respondents are directed to conduct fair and effective investigation in a time bound manner.

4.

Learned Public Prosecutor submits for appropriate directions.

5.

Heard. Considered.

6.

It is well settled legal proposition as expounded in P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement [(2019) 9 SCC 24] that the investigation is in

the domain of the Investigating Officer and the Courts are not supposed to interfere in the investigation, however, it is imperative on his part to

conduct the investigation strictly in accordance with law, in fair and impartial manner, without being influenced by any extraneous consideration.

7.

Therefore, having regard to the above submissions and keeping in view the material available on record, but without expressing any opinion on

merits, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the concerned Superintendent of Police to ensure that investigation in this matter be conducted

strictly in accordance with law in fair, impartial and effective manner, and the same be concluded expeditiously preferably within three months.

8.

A copy of this order under seal and sign of the Court Master be provided to Public Prosecutor for further transmission and compliance.