Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2021) 07 SEBI CK 0060

Prime Plantations Pvt. Ltd. & Ors vs Securities & Exchange Board Of India

Securities Appellate Tribunal Mumbai · Decided on 7 July 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer · M. T. Joshi, J
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Application No. 668 Of 2021, Appeal No.459 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 399 words
1.

There is a delay of 10 days in the filing of the appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned. The application is allowed.

2.

The present appeal has been filed against the order dated March 19, 2021 for violation of the CIS Regulations, the WTM has issued 10 directions,

namely, to wind up the scheme and to refund the monies. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the appellants that majority of the directions

have been duly complied with and the respondent have also been intimated, the balance amount of the monies have also been deposited in the escrow

account.

3.

Considering the aforesaid, we direct the respondent to file a reply within three weeks from today. The matter would be listed for final disposal on

July 30, 2021.

4.

Considering the fact that the scheme which the appellants had initiated was in the year 1992 which came to an end in 1998 prior to the enforcement

of the CIS regulations, we direct that the restraint order shall remain in suspension during the pendency of the appeal.

5.

In addition, the accounts of the company and the directors which have been frozen, it has been stated that the joint accounts in which the appellants

are the second holder have also been frozen. In this regard, we are, prima-facie, of the opinion that the accounts where the appellants are the second

holder should not be frozen. We accordingly direct the appellants to provide the list of the accounts which have been frozen to SEBI. If such details

are provided, the respondent will pass appropriate order within a week thereafter.

6.

Parties will take instructions from the Registrar 48 hrs. before the date fixed in order to find out as to whether the appeal would be heard through

video conference or through physical hearing.

7.

The present matter was heard through video conference due to Covid-19 pandemic. At this stage it is not possible to sign a copy of this order nor a

certified copy of this order could be issued by the Registry. In these circumstances, this order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary on

behalf of the bench and all concerned parties are directed to act on the digitally signed copy of this order. Parties will act on production of a digitally

signed copy sent by fax and/or email.