High CourtsSingle Bench

Prince @ Baba vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 3 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 P&H CK 0043

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotroic Substantes Act, 1985 — Section 22, 50
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 26893 Of 2020 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 383 words

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J

This is 2nd petition for grant of regular bail in FIR No.121 dated 11.06.2018 under Section 22 of NDPS Act, registered at Police Station City Patti,

District Tarn Taran; earlier one i.e. CRM-M-38397-2019 was dismissed as withdrawn on 06.02.2020.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that new ground for filing this second petition is that the petitioner is in long custody of 01 year and 09

months and out of total 08 prosecution witnesses, only 02 PWs have been examined. It is further submitted that as per allegations in the FIR,

registered at the instance of ASI Gurmukh Singh, when he was on patrol duty, on suspicion, he apprehended the petitioner, who was carrying a

polythene bag in his right hand and thereafter, he opened the bag and found that there are 800 loose intoxicant tablets. After conducting the search

and effecting the recovery, a ruqa was sent to the police station for registration of the FIR.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that in fact, at no point, second Investigating Officer was called, as it is clear from the FIR itself that

ruqa was sent to the police station after effecting the recovery from the petitioner. Though it was a case of chance recovery, however, no notice

under Section 50 of NDPS Act was given and the petitioner was not informed about his legal right in this regard. It is further submitted that tablets

recovered from loose tablets and out of 800 tablets, only 10 tablets were sent for chemical examination and the same will not represent the entire bulk

recovered from the petitioner.

Learned State counsel has filed the custody certificate dated 03.03.2021 in the Court today and has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that as

per the custody certificate, the petitioner is involved in one more FIR under NDPS Act, though he is on bail.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, without commenting anything on merits of the case and considering the aforesaid facts and

circumstances of the case and also long custody of the petitioner, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on regular bail

subject to furnishing his bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, concerned.

Petition stands disposed of.