AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
10 paragraphs · 304 wordsSavitri Ratho, J
TRP (C) No.334 of 2022 & I.A. No.377 of 2022
This application has been filed by the petitioner-wife under Section 24 of C.P.C. for transfer of C.P.No.382 of 2021 filed by the opposite party-husband under Section 13 (ia) (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar, to the Court of learned Judge Family Court, Jeypore.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the marriage of the parties had been solemnized on 28.06.2007 but due to demand for further dowry, the opposite party and his mother tortured the petitioner for which the petitioner has lodged the F.I.R. at Laxmipur Police Station leading to Registration of Laxmipur P.S. Case No.85 of 2019 under Sections 498 (A)/323/312/506/34 of I.P.C. read with Section 4 of the D.P. Act. The petitioner is staying with her son in her father’s house at Laxmipur which is more than 400 K.Ms from Bhubaneswar for which it would be inconvenient for her to go to Bhubaneswar to contest the case.
Mr. Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the C.P. Case had been posted to 22.08.2022 and the petitioner did not appear on the said date and now the case is posted to 13.10.2022 for her appearance.
Considering the above submissions, issue notice to the opposite party in the TRP (C) as well as in the I.A. through Registered/Speed post with A.D., returnable within four weeks, requisites for which shall be filed by 30.09.2022. One set of process fee shall be accepted.
List this matter on 16.11.2022.
In the interim, further proceeding in C.P.No.382 of 2021 pending in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar shall remain stayed till the next date.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.
……………………………
