High CourtsSingle Bench

Priyanka Malhotra vs State Of Uttarakhand & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 16 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0245

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.C. Khulbe, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 482 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 406, 506
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Application (C-482) No. 754 Of 2019, Compounding Application (IA No. 12881 Of 2021)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 172 words

R.C. Khulbe, J

1.

By way of present application, moved under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., applicant seeks to quash the entire proceedings of Crl. Case No. 3880 of 2017,

Pradeep Singh Vs. Chandra Mohan Malhotra and others, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st, Rudrapur, District U.S. Nagar.

2.

The parties have filed the above-numbered compounding application to show that they have buried their differences and have settled their disputes

amicably.

3.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the compounding application.

4.

It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the offences punishable under Sections 406, 506 IPC are compoundable offences.

5.

Parties are present before this Court through V.C. and are identified by their respective counsels.

6.

Accordingly, compounding application is allowed. The entire proceedings, mentioned hereinabove, pending between the parties are hereby quashed

against the present applicant only, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.

7.

Present C482 application stands disposed of, as above.

8.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.