AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
18 paragraphs · 326 wordsThis is the Second Bail Application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicants who have
been arrested on 17.08.2016 in connection with Crime No. 63/2016 registered at Police Station Kondagaon, District Kondagaon (CG) for the offence
punishable under Sections 376D, 506 (B) & 323 IPC (both applicants). Applicant No.2 is also charged under Section 3 (2) (5) of Schedule Caste and
Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
The First Bail Application bearing M.Cr.C. No.8552 of 2016 was dismissed as withdrawn on 11.01.2017 with liberty to file afresh after prosecutrix
is examined.
As per the prosecution case, a report was made by the prosecutrix that on 14.03.2016 the applicants came to the house of the prosecutrix and
forcefully committed rape for which on the next day report was lodged.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the statement of the prosecutrix has been recorded and she has been examined as PW-1, her
statement if is read as a whole, would show that the false allegations have been attributed against the applicants and he referred to para 8 & 12 of the
Statement and submits that the applicants may be released on bail.
Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail.
Perused the statement of the prosecutrix. Considering the same, without any observation on merits at this stage, I am inclined to release the
applicants on bail.
Accordingly, the application is allowed and the applicants are directed to be released on bail on each of them executing a personal bond in sum of
Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. They are directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every
date given by the said Court.
It is further observed that this Court has not passed any comments on the merits of this case.
